fabian/fault_injection_async25_paper
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Update on Overleaf.

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Andreas Steininger 2025-02-04 10:17:40 +00:00 committed by node
parent 7b40591da8
commit ff0e3eb199
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
fault_injection_async25.tex
View file

@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ observation is that
a signal coverage of $70\%$ has less deviation from reference for \acs{dims} than $90\%$.
In the first place this indicates the effect of randomness here, but further study is needed to determine the variance for these values.
Finally, Figure~\ref{fig:res/sim_scaling} shows how the configuration parameters for the injection engine influence the number of calculated required injections. Coverage certainty, hit probability, and victim coverage are in a value range of 0 to 1, while expected failure modes per fanout is in range 1 to 3.\\
Finally, Figure~\ref{fig:res/sim_scaling} shows how the configuration parameters for the injection engine influence our calculation for the number of required injections. In the graph we vary coverage certainty, hit probability, and victim coverage in the full range of 0 to 1, while expected failure modes per fanout is in the range from 1 to 3.\\
We see that hit probability, victim coverage, as well as expected failure modes change the number of simulations as we expected. While we expected victim coverage to grow the number of injections linearly, this was under the assumptions of all signals having identical fanout. However, since high fanout signals are selected first, we see strong initial growth, which then plateaus out as only low fanout signals are left to be selected.
\section{Conclusion}